Приказ основних података о документу

The use of hedges and boosters in students' essays on environmental protection written in English

dc.creatorVesić Pavlović, Tijana
dc.creatorĐorđević, Danijela D.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-19T18:56:35Z
dc.date.available2022-09-19T18:56:35Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0522-8468
dc.identifier.urihttps://machinery.mas.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3250
dc.description.abstractPoslednjih godina, upotreba metadiskursa u pisanoj produkciji na univerzitetskom nivou učenja jezika predstavlja vrlo važnu temu u literaturi. Ovaj rad bavi se upotrebom dve specifične metadiskursne odlike, ograda i pojačivača, u esejima studenata posvećenim pitanjima sprečavanja efekata globalnog zagrevanja i napisanim u okviru kursa engleskog jezika na univerzitetskom nivou. Analizirano je ukupno 124 eseja (20.829 reči). Primenom Hajlandovog interpersonalnog modela metadiskursa, utvrđeno je da se u analiziranim esejima znatno češće koriste ograde nego pojačivači (22,23 prema 8,26 na 1000 reči). Unutar obe klase uočavaju se različiti glagolski, imenički, priloški i pridevski markeri ograđivanja i pojačavanja iskaza. U zaključku se ukazuje na neophodnost uvođenja metadiskursnih markera u kurikulum nastave stranog jezika na univerzitetskom nivou s obzirom na njihov značaj ne samo u akademskim, već i u drugim tipovima tekstova s kojima će se (diplomirani) studenti susretati u toku i posle studiranja.SR
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, the use of metadiscourse in the material written at the university level of language learning has been a very important topic in the literature. This paper deals with the use of two specific metadiscourse features, hedges and boosters, in students' essays related to the issues of preventing the effects of global warming. The essays were produced during a university-level English language course at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering. A total of 124 essays (20,829 words) were analysed. Using Hyland's interpersonal metadiscourse model, it was found that hedges were much more frequent in the analysed essays in comparison to boosters (22.23 vs. 8.26 per 1000 words). Within both classes, there were examples of use of different verbs, nouns, adverbs, and adjectives acting as hedges or boosters. The conclusion points to the need to introduce metadiscourse markers in the curriculum of foreign language teaching at the university level, given their importance not only in academic but also in other types of texts that (graduate) students will deal with both during and after their studies.EN
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Beogradu - Filološki fakultet, Beograd
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceAnali Filološkog fakulteta
dc.subjectstudentski esejiSR
dc.subjectpojačivačiSR
dc.subjectogradeSR
dc.subjectmetadiskursSR
dc.subjectengleski jezikSR
dc.subjectstudents' essaysEN
dc.subjectmetadiscourseEN
dc.subjecthedgesEN
dc.subjectEnglishEN
dc.subjectboostersEN
dc.titleUpotreba ograda i pojačivača u studentskim esejima o zaštiti životne sredine na engleskom jezikuSR
dc.titleThe use of hedges and boosters in students' essays on environmental protection written in EnglishEN
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-SA
dc.citation.epage176
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.other32(2): 161-176
dc.citation.rankM51
dc.citation.spage161
dc.citation.volume32
dc.identifier.doi10.18485/analiff.2020.32.2.9
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://machinery.mas.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/1878/3247.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу