Multistage axial compressor flow field predictions using CFD and throughflow calculations
Само за регистроване кориснике
2016
Конференцијски прилог (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
A comparison between two different methods for aerodynamic calculation of multistage axial compressors is presented. Results obtained using classical 2D through-flow calculations were compared with CFD results for several test cases, including various subsonic and supersonic multistage axial compressors with different geometric configurations and stage operating parameters. Calculated flow fields were compared in terms of overall compressor performances, individual blade row operation parameters and spanwise distributions of different flow variables. Nominal and off-design compressor operating conditions were analyzed and all the results were compared with experimental data. Accuracy, advantages and differences between individual methods are discussed.
Извор:
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, 2016, 2C-2016Издавач:
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Колекције
Институција/група
Mašinski fakultetTY - CONF AU - Banjac, Milan AU - Petrović, Milan AU - Wiedermann, Alexander PY - 2016 UR - https://machinery.mas.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2393 AB - A comparison between two different methods for aerodynamic calculation of multistage axial compressors is presented. Results obtained using classical 2D through-flow calculations were compared with CFD results for several test cases, including various subsonic and supersonic multistage axial compressors with different geometric configurations and stage operating parameters. Calculated flow fields were compared in terms of overall compressor performances, individual blade row operation parameters and spanwise distributions of different flow variables. Nominal and off-design compressor operating conditions were analyzed and all the results were compared with experimental data. Accuracy, advantages and differences between individual methods are discussed. PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) C3 - Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo T1 - Multistage axial compressor flow field predictions using CFD and throughflow calculations VL - 2C-2016 DO - 10.1115/GT2016-57632 ER -
@conference{ author = "Banjac, Milan and Petrović, Milan and Wiedermann, Alexander", year = "2016", abstract = "A comparison between two different methods for aerodynamic calculation of multistage axial compressors is presented. Results obtained using classical 2D through-flow calculations were compared with CFD results for several test cases, including various subsonic and supersonic multistage axial compressors with different geometric configurations and stage operating parameters. Calculated flow fields were compared in terms of overall compressor performances, individual blade row operation parameters and spanwise distributions of different flow variables. Nominal and off-design compressor operating conditions were analyzed and all the results were compared with experimental data. Accuracy, advantages and differences between individual methods are discussed.", publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)", journal = "Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo", title = "Multistage axial compressor flow field predictions using CFD and throughflow calculations", volume = "2C-2016", doi = "10.1115/GT2016-57632" }
Banjac, M., Petrović, M.,& Wiedermann, A.. (2016). Multistage axial compressor flow field predictions using CFD and throughflow calculations. in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)., 2C-2016. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2016-57632
Banjac M, Petrović M, Wiedermann A. Multistage axial compressor flow field predictions using CFD and throughflow calculations. in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo. 2016;2C-2016. doi:10.1115/GT2016-57632 .
Banjac, Milan, Petrović, Milan, Wiedermann, Alexander, "Multistage axial compressor flow field predictions using CFD and throughflow calculations" in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, 2C-2016 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2016-57632 . .