Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorBošnjak, Srđan
dc.creatorPetković, Zoran D.
dc.creatorSimonović, Aleksandar
dc.creatorZrnić, Nenad
dc.creatorGnjatović, Nebojša
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-19T17:11:35Z
dc.date.available2022-09-19T17:11:35Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1350-6307
dc.identifier.urihttps://machinery.mas.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1705
dc.description.abstractThe traveling mechanism of the C-700S bucket wheel excavator is of the two-crawler type. Rigid connections between the undercarriage and the crawler beams offer a very high factor of safety against tipping but at the same time create unfavorable conditions for ground surface adaptation. Connections between the crawler beams and the undercarriage cylindrical girder were realized by means of connection girders with open cross sections (I sections). In order to eliminate the occurrence of cracks, the original undercarriage structure (variant I) has been redesigned (variant II). The key idea was to strengthen the already mentioned connection girders by building in vertical plates. In this way the cross-sections were closed and their torsional rigidity became considerably greater, which led to the adaptation of the traveling mechanism to the ground surface becoming practically impossible. Because of that alone, and within a very short period after the reconstruction, new cracks occurred on elements of the original structure and even on added structural elements. Based on the FEA results, it was concluded that cracks occurrence for variants I and II of the undercarriage structure is caused by highly pronounced stress concentration. Subtle load and stress analyses in various working regimes, presented in the paper, led to the achievement of a re-redesigned undercarriage structure (variant III) with more uniform stress distribution. Stress level in the critical zone for variant III of the undercarriage structure is considerably lower than stress levels for both variant (approximate to 2.1 times) and variant II (approximate to 2.5 times). It is very important to note that the weight of the new built-in elements for variant II is six times greater than that for variant III. During ensuing exploitation in extremely heavy duty conditions, no damages for variant III of the considered structure were observed.en
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Technological Development (TD or TR)/35006/RS//
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceEngineering Failure Analysis
dc.subjectUndercarriageen
dc.subjectRedesignen
dc.subjectFEAen
dc.subjectDamage diagnosticsen
dc.subjectBucket wheel excavatoren
dc.title'Designing-in' failures and redesign of bucket wheel excavator undercarriageen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage103
dc.citation.other35: 95-103
dc.citation.rankM21
dc.citation.spage95
dc.citation.volume35
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.12.007
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84888136373
dc.identifier.wos000329079200010
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу