Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor
Samo za registrovane korisnike
2011
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
Estimation of the tray (plate) efficiency is the basis of trayed column design. A newly introduced parameter "normalized efficiency" (eta) is compared to the stripping factor (lambda) in order to derive a correlation which can be useful in engineering practice. The proposed correlation is based on the numerous data gathered from various literature sources describing distillation, absorption, and stripping (desorption) columns and covering sieve, tunnel, bubble-cup, uniflux, and jet trays, in the range lambda = 0.0391-2196. The final form of this correlation is eta c = {1/1 + 1.5 lambda(0.9) for lambda lt = 1 lambda 0.3/1.5 + lambda(0.3) for lambda lt = 1 with correlation ratio Theta = 0.883 and standard deviation Delta(av) = 13.1%.
Izvor:
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50, 12, 7445-7451Izdavač:
- Amer Chemical Soc, Washington
Finansiranje / projekti:
- Ministry of Science and Technological Development of Serbia
DOI: 10.1021/ie101052f
ISSN: 0888-5885
WoS: 000291323000039
Scopus: 2-s2.0-79958801089
Kolekcije
Institucija/grupa
Mašinski fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Jaćimović, Branislav M. AU - Genić, Srbislav PY - 2011 UR - https://machinery.mas.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1208 AB - Estimation of the tray (plate) efficiency is the basis of trayed column design. A newly introduced parameter "normalized efficiency" (eta) is compared to the stripping factor (lambda) in order to derive a correlation which can be useful in engineering practice. The proposed correlation is based on the numerous data gathered from various literature sources describing distillation, absorption, and stripping (desorption) columns and covering sieve, tunnel, bubble-cup, uniflux, and jet trays, in the range lambda = 0.0391-2196. The final form of this correlation is eta c = {1/1 + 1.5 lambda(0.9) for lambda lt = 1 lambda 0.3/1.5 + lambda(0.3) for lambda lt = 1 with correlation ratio Theta = 0.883 and standard deviation Delta(av) = 13.1%. PB - Amer Chemical Soc, Washington T2 - Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research T1 - Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor EP - 7451 IS - 12 SP - 7445 VL - 50 DO - 10.1021/ie101052f ER -
@article{ author = "Jaćimović, Branislav M. and Genić, Srbislav", year = "2011", abstract = "Estimation of the tray (plate) efficiency is the basis of trayed column design. A newly introduced parameter "normalized efficiency" (eta) is compared to the stripping factor (lambda) in order to derive a correlation which can be useful in engineering practice. The proposed correlation is based on the numerous data gathered from various literature sources describing distillation, absorption, and stripping (desorption) columns and covering sieve, tunnel, bubble-cup, uniflux, and jet trays, in the range lambda = 0.0391-2196. The final form of this correlation is eta c = {1/1 + 1.5 lambda(0.9) for lambda lt = 1 lambda 0.3/1.5 + lambda(0.3) for lambda lt = 1 with correlation ratio Theta = 0.883 and standard deviation Delta(av) = 13.1%.", publisher = "Amer Chemical Soc, Washington", journal = "Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research", title = "Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor", pages = "7451-7445", number = "12", volume = "50", doi = "10.1021/ie101052f" }
Jaćimović, B. M.,& Genić, S.. (2011). Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor. in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research Amer Chemical Soc, Washington., 50(12), 7445-7451. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101052f
Jaćimović BM, Genić S. Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor. in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2011;50(12):7445-7451. doi:10.1021/ie101052f .
Jaćimović, Branislav M., Genić, Srbislav, "Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor" in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 50, no. 12 (2011):7445-7451, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101052f . .