Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor
Само за регистроване кориснике
2011
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Estimation of the tray (plate) efficiency is the basis of trayed column design. A newly introduced parameter "normalized efficiency" (eta) is compared to the stripping factor (lambda) in order to derive a correlation which can be useful in engineering practice. The proposed correlation is based on the numerous data gathered from various literature sources describing distillation, absorption, and stripping (desorption) columns and covering sieve, tunnel, bubble-cup, uniflux, and jet trays, in the range lambda = 0.0391-2196. The final form of this correlation is eta c = {1/1 + 1.5 lambda(0.9) for lambda lt = 1 lambda 0.3/1.5 + lambda(0.3) for lambda lt = 1 with correlation ratio Theta = 0.883 and standard deviation Delta(av) = 13.1%.
Извор:
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50, 12, 7445-7451Издавач:
- Amer Chemical Soc, Washington
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Ministry of Science and Technological Development of Serbia
DOI: 10.1021/ie101052f
ISSN: 0888-5885
WoS: 000291323000039
Scopus: 2-s2.0-79958801089
Колекције
Институција/група
Mašinski fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Jaćimović, Branislav M. AU - Genić, Srbislav PY - 2011 UR - https://machinery.mas.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1208 AB - Estimation of the tray (plate) efficiency is the basis of trayed column design. A newly introduced parameter "normalized efficiency" (eta) is compared to the stripping factor (lambda) in order to derive a correlation which can be useful in engineering practice. The proposed correlation is based on the numerous data gathered from various literature sources describing distillation, absorption, and stripping (desorption) columns and covering sieve, tunnel, bubble-cup, uniflux, and jet trays, in the range lambda = 0.0391-2196. The final form of this correlation is eta c = {1/1 + 1.5 lambda(0.9) for lambda lt = 1 lambda 0.3/1.5 + lambda(0.3) for lambda lt = 1 with correlation ratio Theta = 0.883 and standard deviation Delta(av) = 13.1%. PB - Amer Chemical Soc, Washington T2 - Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research T1 - Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor EP - 7451 IS - 12 SP - 7445 VL - 50 DO - 10.1021/ie101052f ER -
@article{ author = "Jaćimović, Branislav M. and Genić, Srbislav", year = "2011", abstract = "Estimation of the tray (plate) efficiency is the basis of trayed column design. A newly introduced parameter "normalized efficiency" (eta) is compared to the stripping factor (lambda) in order to derive a correlation which can be useful in engineering practice. The proposed correlation is based on the numerous data gathered from various literature sources describing distillation, absorption, and stripping (desorption) columns and covering sieve, tunnel, bubble-cup, uniflux, and jet trays, in the range lambda = 0.0391-2196. The final form of this correlation is eta c = {1/1 + 1.5 lambda(0.9) for lambda lt = 1 lambda 0.3/1.5 + lambda(0.3) for lambda lt = 1 with correlation ratio Theta = 0.883 and standard deviation Delta(av) = 13.1%.", publisher = "Amer Chemical Soc, Washington", journal = "Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research", title = "Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor", pages = "7451-7445", number = "12", volume = "50", doi = "10.1021/ie101052f" }
Jaćimović, B. M.,& Genić, S.. (2011). Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor. in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research Amer Chemical Soc, Washington., 50(12), 7445-7451. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101052f
Jaćimović BM, Genić S. Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor. in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2011;50(12):7445-7451. doi:10.1021/ie101052f .
Jaćimović, Branislav M., Genić, Srbislav, "Tray Efficiency versus Stripping Factor" in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 50, no. 12 (2011):7445-7451, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101052f . .