Show simple item record

dc.creatorSpasojević Brkić, Vesna
dc.creatorTomić, Branislav
dc.creatorVeljković, Zorica
dc.creatorAlgheriani, Nuri Mohamed Saad
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-01T12:24:26Z
dc.date.available2023-02-01T12:24:26Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://machinery.mas.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4134
dc.description.abstractQuality improvement initiatives failures have triggered scientists, experts, and practitioners for long period of time while this issue becomes even more serious since today competition moves beyond a single firm into the supply chain. The aim of this survey is to find statistically significant differences of quality improvement practice between groups of companies in multinational supply chain. In the first phase, the survey is emailed to all 87 multinational company manufacturing sites and the responses were received from 62 companies (response rate 71.3%). Based on received responses, in the second phase their suppliers worldwide are contacted and 143 supplier companies have replied. There were 153 companies from aerospace (planes) and 47 companies from transportation sector (trains). The total number of received responses in survey was 200. The responses came from 6 continents and 32 countries. In the sample approximately 70% of the plants had more than 500 workers. Differences in quality tools and techniques application were statistically tested. There were found significant differences in quality improvement practice between aerospace and transportation sectors. Aerospace companies have more advanced quality improvement practice. There also were found significant differences in quality improvement practice between multinational company manufacturing sites and their suppliers. It could be noticed that suppliers are very well chosen, since they have slightly higher values of quality improvement practice dimensions. Most frequently used basic quality tools are flow chart, histogram and Pareto diagram; the most frequently used advanced tool is CPM/PERT, and the most frequently used quality technique is brainstorming, followed by benchmarking and FMEA. The results of this survey have implications for business practice since it has proven that special attention has to be put on core business products and suppliers choice.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceMaintenance forum 2017sr
dc.subjectquality improvementsr
dc.subjectsupply chainsr
dc.subjectdifferencessr
dc.titleDifferences of Quality Improvement Practice Between Groups of Companies in Multinational Supply Chainsr
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dc.citation.volume1 (1)
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://machinery.mas.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/9472/Maintenance2017198-203V_Spasojevic_Brkic-2-7.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_machinery_4134
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record