Comparative Exemination of the Strengthened and Non-Strengthened NIMONIC Specimens with Laser Shot Peening Method
2018
Аутори
Petronić, SanjaČolić, Katarina
Đorđević, Branislav R.
Mišković, Žarko
Katnić, Djurica
Vučetić, Filip
Конференцијски прилог (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Laser shot peening (LSP) of material strengthening is nowdays widely used method in various branches of industry. In this paper are presented comparative exeminations of specimen made of NIMONIC and strengthened specimen on which laser shot peening method was performed. Specimens were made as thin plates with holes. Macrostructural surface tests were performed around the specimens holes with different magnifications for both specimens as well as certain damages on the specimens. 3D images of specimens damages provide insights into the its dimensions. In addition, the roughness of non-strengthed and strengthed specimens was also performed. Hardness tests using the Rockwell C method of both specimens show a difference in the hardness of both samples and the main characteristics of the laser shot peening method. Also, the analysis on how the damage of samples could represent the location of initial cracks that could cause failure of the specimens or generally machine part is given as well....
Кључне речи:
Nimonic / Macrostructural surface tests / Laser shot peeningИзвор:
Procedia Structural Integrity - ECF22 - Loading and environmental effects on structural integrity, 2018, 13, 2255-2260Издавач:
- Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Развој савремених метода дијагностике и испитивања машинских структура (RS-MESTD-Technological Development (TD or TR)-35040)
- Испитивање и верификација метода за мултидисциплинарне форензичке анализе у функцији непролиферације оружја за масовно уништење (RS-MESTD-Technological Development (TD or TR)-37021)
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.131
ISSN: 2452-3216
WoS: 000459860900369
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85064689758
Институција/група
Inovacioni centarTY - CONF AU - Petronić, Sanja AU - Čolić, Katarina AU - Đorđević, Branislav R. AU - Mišković, Žarko AU - Katnić, Djurica AU - Vučetić, Filip PY - 2018 UR - https://machinery.mas.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2852 AB - Laser shot peening (LSP) of material strengthening is nowdays widely used method in various branches of industry. In this paper are presented comparative exeminations of specimen made of NIMONIC and strengthened specimen on which laser shot peening method was performed. Specimens were made as thin plates with holes. Macrostructural surface tests were performed around the specimens holes with different magnifications for both specimens as well as certain damages on the specimens. 3D images of specimens damages provide insights into the its dimensions. In addition, the roughness of non-strengthed and strengthed specimens was also performed. Hardness tests using the Rockwell C method of both specimens show a difference in the hardness of both samples and the main characteristics of the laser shot peening method. Also, the analysis on how the damage of samples could represent the location of initial cracks that could cause failure of the specimens or generally machine part is given as well. PB - Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam C3 - Procedia Structural Integrity - ECF22 - Loading and environmental effects on structural integrity T1 - Comparative Exemination of the Strengthened and Non-Strengthened NIMONIC Specimens with Laser Shot Peening Method EP - 2260 SP - 2255 VL - 13 DO - 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.131 ER -
@conference{ author = "Petronić, Sanja and Čolić, Katarina and Đorđević, Branislav R. and Mišković, Žarko and Katnić, Djurica and Vučetić, Filip", year = "2018", abstract = "Laser shot peening (LSP) of material strengthening is nowdays widely used method in various branches of industry. In this paper are presented comparative exeminations of specimen made of NIMONIC and strengthened specimen on which laser shot peening method was performed. Specimens were made as thin plates with holes. Macrostructural surface tests were performed around the specimens holes with different magnifications for both specimens as well as certain damages on the specimens. 3D images of specimens damages provide insights into the its dimensions. In addition, the roughness of non-strengthed and strengthed specimens was also performed. Hardness tests using the Rockwell C method of both specimens show a difference in the hardness of both samples and the main characteristics of the laser shot peening method. Also, the analysis on how the damage of samples could represent the location of initial cracks that could cause failure of the specimens or generally machine part is given as well.", publisher = "Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam", journal = "Procedia Structural Integrity - ECF22 - Loading and environmental effects on structural integrity", title = "Comparative Exemination of the Strengthened and Non-Strengthened NIMONIC Specimens with Laser Shot Peening Method", pages = "2260-2255", volume = "13", doi = "10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.131" }
Petronić, S., Čolić, K., Đorđević, B. R., Mišković, Ž., Katnić, D.,& Vučetić, F.. (2018). Comparative Exemination of the Strengthened and Non-Strengthened NIMONIC Specimens with Laser Shot Peening Method. in Procedia Structural Integrity - ECF22 - Loading and environmental effects on structural integrity Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam., 13, 2255-2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.131
Petronić S, Čolić K, Đorđević BR, Mišković Ž, Katnić D, Vučetić F. Comparative Exemination of the Strengthened and Non-Strengthened NIMONIC Specimens with Laser Shot Peening Method. in Procedia Structural Integrity - ECF22 - Loading and environmental effects on structural integrity. 2018;13:2255-2260. doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.131 .
Petronić, Sanja, Čolić, Katarina, Đorđević, Branislav R., Mišković, Žarko, Katnić, Djurica, Vučetić, Filip, "Comparative Exemination of the Strengthened and Non-Strengthened NIMONIC Specimens with Laser Shot Peening Method" in Procedia Structural Integrity - ECF22 - Loading and environmental effects on structural integrity, 13 (2018):2255-2260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.131 . .